European Union
International Standa...
NGOs
United Nations
Afghanistan
Aland Islands
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua & Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Botswana
Bouvet Island
Brazil
British Indian Ocean...
British Virgin Islands
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burma (Myanmar)
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde Islands
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo (Brazzaville)
Congo, Democratic Re...
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
French Southern Terr...
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Hawai
Heard and McDonald I...
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
North Korea
Northern Marianas Islands
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Authority
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn Island
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome & Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Georgia
South Korea
Spain
Sri Lanka
St-Barthelemy
St-Martin
St. Helena
St. Kitts & Nevis
St. Lucia
St. Pierre et Miquelon
St. Vincent & the Gr...
Sudan
Suriname
Svalbard & Jan Mayen...
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan (Republic of ...
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad & Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks & Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States (Minor...
United States of America
Uruguay
US Virgin Islands
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City State (...
Venezuela
Vietnam
Wallis & Futuna Islands
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
|
Nanologue
| Report Title: |
Opinions on the Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of Nanotechnology: Results from a Consultation With Representatives from Research, Business and Civil Society |
| Report ID: |
233 |
| Date: |
5/1/2006 |
| Author: |
Volker Türk, Claudia Kaiser, Dr. Christa Liedtke, Hugh Knowles, Vicky Murray, Stephan Schaller, Dr. Holger Wallbaum, and Dr. Hans Kastenholz, Andreas R. Köhler |
| Report Type: |
General Report |
| Publication: |
nanologue.net |
| URL: |
[NanologueWP34FinalPublic.pdf] |
| Country: |
European Union |
| Organization: |
Nanologue |
| Summary: |
This paper presents the results from the Nanologue projects second phase: the engagement and dialogue on the societal benefits and risks of nanotechnology (NT) applications with representatives from research and civil society. Building upon the first project findings, it aims at establishing a deeper understanding on the ethical, legal and social (ELS) benefits and risks of NT-applications in the view of civil society and researchers. Using interviews and stakeholder workshops the main objectives were to engage with representatives from research and development of NT, interview the societal groups engaged in this project phase in order to further develop and substantiate the benefits and potential impacts of NT (identified in the first project phase), to facilitate the process of prioritizing the benefits and potential impacts identified, and to contribute to the development of the subsequent project work such scenarios exploring how business, civil society and public institutions can engage effectively in a dialogue on the ethical, social and legal aspects of NT. |
| Archived Copy: |
NanologueWP34FinalPublic_233_8071.pdf |
 |
|
| Report Title: |
The Future of Nanotechnology: We Need to Talk |
| Report ID: |
230 |
| Date: |
10/1/2006 |
| Author: |
Volker Türk, Hugh Knowles, Prof Dr Holger Wallbaum, Dr Hans Kastenholz |
| Report Type: |
pamphlet |
| URL: |
[nanologue_scenarios_en.pdf] |
| Country: |
Other |
| Organization: |
Nanologue |
| Summary: |
This pamphlet is a result of the Nanologue project, an 18-month European Commission-funded project designed to support dialogue on the social, ethical and legal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnologies. The aims of this pamphlet are four-fold: to disseminate a brief summary of the findings from the Nanologue project, to provide a very short introduction to some of the risks and opportunities presented by nanotechnology, to explore three possible futures in the development of nanotechnology, and to discuss how dialogue can be used as part of a process to ensure that society maximizes the benefits from nanotechnologies and minimizes the risks.
|
| Archived Copy: |
nanologue_scenarios_en_230_8727.pdf |
|
|
|