European Union International Standa... NGOs United Nations
Aland Islands Albania Andorra Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia & Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Faroe Islands Finland France Georgia Germany Gibraltar Greece Guernsey Hungary Iceland Ireland Isle of Man Italy Jersey Kazakhstan Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macedonia Malta Moldova Monaco Montenegro Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia San Marino Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Svalbard & Jan Mayen... Sweden Switzerland Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom Vatican City State (...
|
ItalyEPA, National Center for Environmental Assessment
Report Title: |
External Review Draft, Nanomaterial Case Studies: Nanoscale Titanium Dioxide in Water Treatment and in Topical Sunscreen |
Report ID: |
210 |
Date: |
7/1/2009 |
Author: |
EPA, National Center for Environmental Assessment |
Report Type: |
Study |
URL: |
[eimscomm.getfile] |
Country: |
United States of America |
Organization: |
EPA, National Center for Environmental Assessment |
Summary: |
This draft study of two specific nanotechnology applications, titanium dioxide in water treatment and topical sunscreen, is intended to be a foundation for the development of “scientific and technical information needed for future assessment efforts.” The EPA encourages readers to comment on specific “knowledge gaps” which exist in this draft, and to offer suggestions as to how these gaps may be better addressed in the future. The comprehensive environmental assessment (CEA) approach taken in this document combines a life-cycle framework with a risk assessment paradigm, examining the direct and indirect effects of titanium dioxide throughout a product’s life cycle, including disposal. In order, the study examines the stages of the life cycle in question, fate and transport processes, exposure-dose characterization, and ecological and health effects. This document is not intended to provide an actual CEA of titanium dioxide, but only to identify which information is known and needs to be known to conduct an comprehensive assessment of similar nanomaterials in the future. |
Archived Copy: |
EPA_NANOMATERIAL_CASE_STUDIES_ERD[1]_210_3052.pdf |
 |
|
|